What are you working on?
Enter your research topic to find gaps, or paste reviewer comments to draft a response. Results in minutes.
You will be asked to sign in to continue.
Know what is missing before you start writing
Enter a topic. The system searches the literature, verifies each source, and returns a list of gaps with research opportunities ranked by feasibility.
Keyword extraction
Describe your topic in plain language. The system breaks it into primary, secondary, methodological, and contextual keywords suited to academic databases.
Multi-database search
Searches Semantic Scholar, arXiv, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore at the same time. Returns 30 to 80 papers in minutes rather than weeks of manual work.
Source verification
Every paper is checked through DOI resolution and database lookups. Retracted papers are excluded. Unverifiable references are flagged and removed.
Gap analysis
The system maps what has been studied and what has not, then classifies gaps as theoretical, methodological, empirical, or contextual, with supporting evidence.
Opportunity ranking
Each gap is turned into a research opportunity with a research question, suggested methodology, feasibility rating, and estimated impact.
Paper outline
Choose an opportunity and receive a full outline: title options, a draft abstract, section structure, and a list of target journals.
Works for original research, reviews, meta-analyses, case studies, theses, and more
Address every comment. Resubmit in days, not weeks.
Upload your reviewer feedback. The system drafts a point-by-point response letter, revises the manuscript, and finds missing references.
Comment breakdown
Each reviewer comment is parsed, categorised by severity, and matched to the section of your manuscript that needs attention.
Response letter
Produces a point-by-point response letter with the correct tone: respectful where needed, firm where appropriate, and specific throughout.
Manuscript revision
Rewrites the sections that reviewers flagged. Adds paragraphs, tightens arguments, and expands where more detail was requested.
Reference finder
When a reviewer asks for more citations, the system finds relevant, recent, peer-reviewed papers and integrates them into your text.
Methodology support
Helps you justify design choices, explain statistical decisions, and add the detail reviewers expect in a methods section.
Track changes export
Exports the revised manuscript in Word with tracked changes, or in LaTeX with diff markup, ready for resubmission.
Three steps
Enter your topic or upload reviews
Starting a new paper? Type your topic. Already submitted? Upload the reviewer feedback and your manuscript.
Agents search, verify, and draft
The system searches databases, verifies sources, identifies gaps, drafts responses, and revises your manuscript.
Review the output and submit
Check the results, adjust as needed, export in the format you need, and submit your paper or resubmission.
Six agents, each with a specific job
They run in parallel and pass results to each other automatically.
Discovery Agent
Searches academic databases, checks that papers exist, and scores them for relevance to your topic.
- Multi-database search
- DOI verification
- Relevance scoring
Gap Analyst
Reads the verified literature and identifies what has not been studied, what is outdated, and where findings conflict.
- 8 gap types
- Evidence-based reports
- Feasibility scoring
Outline Agent
Produces a paper outline matched to your article type, with section headings, a draft abstract, and suggested journals.
- 10 article type formats
- Journal suggestions
- Argument structure
Response Agent
Writes point-by-point response letters. Acknowledges valid criticism, rebuts where appropriate, and references specific changes.
- Professional tone
- Page and line references
- Editor cover letters
Revision Agent
Rewrites sections of your manuscript where reviewers identified problems, while keeping your voice and argument intact.
- Section-level rewriting
- Voice preservation
- Consistency checks
Citation Agent
Finds references that reviewers asked for, verifies they exist, formats them in the correct style, and drafts integrating sentences.
- Verified references only
- Any citation style
- Draft integration text
Supported formats
Original research
Empirical studies with hypotheses, data collection, and analysis. IMRaD structure and methodology justification included.
Review articles
Systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and narrative reviews. Search protocols, thematic synthesis, and gap mapping.
Meta-analyses
Quantitative synthesis of existing research. Identification of primary studies, moderating variables, and effect sizes.
Theses and dissertations
Masters or PhD, from proposal to examiner corrections. Multi-chapter structure and viva preparation.
Conference papers
Short papers, full papers, and workshop submissions. Scoped to match venue word limits and expectations.
Methodology and case studies
Methods papers, technical reports, position papers, and case analyses, each with the appropriate structure.
Results from real researchers
"I entered my topic and within minutes had a verified literature map with three gaps I had not noticed. My supervisor said the proposal was the strongest she had seen from a first-year PhD."
"I had 47 reviewer comments. Novinax helped me address every one systematically. The response letter was done in a weekend instead of three weeks. Accepted with minor revisions."
"The gap analysis identified a methodological blind spot that more than 40 papers had missed. That became my PhD contribution. It shaped my entire thesis direction."
Common questions
Is this considered academic misconduct?
No. Novinax is a writing and research assistant, comparable to Grammarly or a professional editor. You control every word. The ideas, data, and conclusions are yours. We recommend disclosing AI tool usage per your institution's policy.
How is this different from searching Google Scholar?
Google Scholar gives you a list of links. Novinax verifies every source exists, scores relevance, identifies gaps across the full set of papers, and produces ranked research opportunities with outlines you can use immediately.
Can it handle technical reviewer comments?
Yes. The agents work across 120+ research fields and understand domain-specific terminology, methodology critiques, and statistical concerns. You provide the expertise; the system helps you express the response clearly.
What if I disagree with a reviewer?
The Response Agent can draft a rebuttal that acknowledges the reviewer's point and then presents your counter-argument with supporting evidence. The tone stays professional.
What article types are supported?
Original research, reviews, meta-analyses, case studies, methodology papers, theses, conference papers, technical reports, and position papers, across all fields.
Are the references real?
Every reference is verified through DOI resolution against Crossref, Semantic Scholar, PubMed, or arXiv. References that cannot be verified are excluded from results.
What file formats are supported?
Upload in PDF, Word, or LaTeX. Export in Word (with track changes), LaTeX (with diff markup), or PDF. All major citation styles are supported: APA, IEEE, Chicago, Harvard, Vancouver, and MLA.
Start your next paper today.
Enter a topic or upload reviewer comments. See results in minutes.
Free tier includes literature discovery + 1 revision per month. No credit card. Cancel anytime.